Canonsphere

CSINv3
Menu
Submit a Manuscript
Tag

case comments

Browsing
Case Comments

CASE ANALYSIS: SHREYA SINGHAL VS. UNION OF INDIA OF INDIA, AIR 2015 SC 1523

This case commentary is written by Atiya Sanjida, a 4th year student of University of Calcutta. She is a detailed oriented law student who is specialised in Legal Drafting.

ABSTRACT

“Case Analysis: Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India” examines the landmark Supreme Court judgment that invalidated Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. This blog will include a detailed examination of the facts, legal arguments, and the court’s ruling, which emphasized the importance of free speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution2. The case commentary will also discuss the broader implications of this
decision on internet freedom and legal precedents in India.

Case-Shreya-Singhal-VS-UOI.docxDownload
by
Keep Reading
Archive

Case Commentary: Ajay Kumar Sunil Kumar Sharma vs. The State of Maharashtra

This case commentary is written by Vivek, a final year law student at Dr. D.Y. Patil College of Law. He is passionate about law and various branches of law and has a continuous knack for the same.

ABSTRACT

Case Commentary: Ajaykumar Sunil Kumar Sharma vs. The State of Maharashtra” provides an in-depth analysis of this significant legal case. This blog will include a detailed examination of the facts, legal arguments, and the court’s judgment. It will also discuss the implications of the verdict and its impact on the legal landscape. By exploring these elements, the commentary aims to offer a comprehensive understanding of the case and its relevance to contemporary legal issues.

Case-Ajaykumar-Sunilkumar-Sharma-Vs.-State-of-Maharashtra-2013-SCC-OnLine-Bom-359.docxDownload
by
Keep Reading
Case Comments

CASE COMMENTARY ON ARUNA SHANBAUG

This case commentary is written by Bhavneet, A fifth year law student of Chandigarh University. She is passionate for law and has written various blogs and articles which has helped widen her knowledge.

ABSTRACT

Case Commentary: Aruna Shanbaug” provides a detailed analysis of the landmark Supreme Court case, Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug vs. Union of India. This blog will include an examination of the facts, legal arguments, and the court’s judgment, which distinguished between active and passive euthanasia and established guidelines for the latter in exceptional circumstances. The commentary will also discuss the broader implications of the case on end-of-life decisions and the right to die with dignity in India.

Powered By EmbedPress

by
Keep Reading