This case comment has been written by Navya Madhunala. She is a fifth-year BBA LL.B. (Hons.) student at ICFAI Law School. She is an enthusiastic and curious law student who enjoys exploring diverse areas of law throughM research and legal writing, with a strong commitment to continuous learning and academic growth.

ABSTRACT

This case commentary examines the Bombay High Court’s decision in Bajaj Electricals Ltd. v. Gourav Bajaj & Anr., which reinforces legal safeguards for well-known trademarks under Indian law. The Court granted interim injunction against the unauthorized use of the mark “BAJAJ,” holding that such use constituted trademark infringement, passing off, and copyright violation. It rejected the defense of bona fide surname use, citing dishonest intent and likelihood of consumer confusion. Emphasizing that personal names cannot justify deceptive branding, the judgment highlights the scope of protection under Sections 2(1)(zg), 29, and 27(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. The decision affirms that reputation-based rights merit strong interim protection, even in the absence of actual confusion.