This case commentary is written by Atiya Sanjida, a 4th-year student at the University of Calcutta. She is a detail-oriented law student who specializes in Legal Drafting.
ABSTRACT
“Case Analysis: Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India” examines the landmark Supreme Court judgment that invalidated Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. This blog will include a detailed examination of the facts, legal arguments, and the court’s ruling, which emphasized the importance of free speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution2. The case commentary will also discuss the broader implications of this decision on internet freedom and legal precedents in India.
